Over that time, two letters to the editor were not published, so 77% of my submissions made the paper. One of the unpublished letters was considered for publication but not printed. The other letter was actually one of my favorites. It concerns the war in Iraq and a 2005 opinion piece comparing Iraq to Vietnam. I thought I used some good information in my letter, but I am sure there are a lot of people much more qualified in Washington D.C. to write on the issues of history and war than I am.
Of course, that means that I have already exhausted my allotment of published letters until 2010. Oh well, I can always just write directly to the author of the offending article. Now, those letters get totally ignored! Amazing. You'd think the authors might acknowledge their readers, but they seem to be unable to take criticism. If their mailbox is so full of offensive letters that they don't bother to read the e-mail, then maybe they shouldn't publicize the e-mail address.
No comments:
Post a Comment